Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorGanesh, Shiv
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-27T03:41:08Z
dc.date.available2010-01-27T03:41:08Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationGanesh, S. (2009). OrganiZational communication and organiSational communication: Binaries and the fragments of a field. Communication Journal of New Zealand, 10(2), 6-17.en
dc.identifier.issn1175-4486
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/3534
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I employ personal narrative to help cast light on connections and tensions between organiZational communication research, as produced in the United States, and organiSational communication research, as produced in Aotearoa New Zealand. I address the issue by highlighting three sets of differences between these bodies of research: canonical, institutional and theoretical. I then unpack how these differences are apparent in my own university before sketching out three ways in which we might productively use such tensions to achieve radical engagement, and critique disciplinary others, identities, and locations.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNew Zealand Communication Associationen
dc.relation.urihttp://nzca.org/journals.htmlen
dc.rightsThis article is published in the Communication Journal of New Zealand. © Copyright 2009 New Zealand Communication Association. Used with permission.en
dc.subjectdifferenceen
dc.subjectorganisational communicationen
dc.subjectorganizational communicationen
dc.titleOrganiZational communication and organiSational communication: Binaries and the fragments of a fielden
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.relation.isPartOfCommunication Journal of New Zealanden_NZ
pubs.begin-page6en_NZ
pubs.elements-id34576
pubs.end-page17en_NZ
pubs.issue2en_NZ
pubs.volume10en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record