Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorLuisetti, Tiziana
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Ian J.
dc.contributor.authorTurner, R. Kerry
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T22:06:42Z
dc.date.available2011-05-24T22:06:42Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationLuisetti, T., Bateman, I.J. & Turner, R.K. (2011). Testing the fundamental assumption of choice experiments: Are values absolute or relative? Land Economics, 87(2), 284-296.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/5355
dc.description.abstractA split sample experiment is conducted to test one of the most fundamental assumptions underpinning choice experiments in an environmental setting: whether stated values are absolute or relative. The test uses a natural experiment involving respondents at different home locations relative to potential new wetland sites. Respondents were presented with one of two ranges of distances. An absolute value interpretation requires that the functional relations with distance derived from these two ranges be consistent with each other. We reject a null hypothesis of no range bias, suggesting that respondents may perceive attribute levels in a relative rather than absolute sense.en_NZ
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.urihttp://le.uwpress.org/content/87/2/284.abstracten_NZ
dc.subjectchoice experimenten_NZ
dc.titleTesting the fundamental assumption of choice experiments: Are values absolute or relative?en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record