Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Claire Maree
dc.contributor.authorDuggan, Ian C.
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-23T23:08:40Z
dc.date.available2011-08-23T23:08:40Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationTaylor, C.M. & Duggan, I.C. (2012). Can biotic resistance be utilized to reduce establishment rates of non-indigenous species in constructed waters? Biological invasions, 14(2), 307-322.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/5615
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the mechanisms that facilitate establishment of non-indigenous species is imperative for devising techniques to reduce invasion rates. Passively dispersing non-indigenous organisms, including zooplankton, seemingly invade constructed waters (e.g., ornamental ponds, dams and reservoirs) at faster rates than natural lakes. A common attribute of these invaded water bodies is their relatively young age, leading to the assertion that low biotic resistance may lead to their higher vulnerability. Our aim was to determine if seeding of young water bodies with sediments containing diapausing stages of native zooplankton could accelerate community development, leading to greater biotic resistance to the establishment of new species. Twenty outdoor tanks were filled with water (1,400 L) and nutrients added to attain eutrophic conditions. Ten treatment tanks had sediments added, sourced from local water bodies. In the remaining ten, sediments were autoclaved, and received zooplankton via natural dispersal only. In an initial 12 month monitoring period, species richness increased at a greater rate in the treatment tanks (at 12 months average standing richness per tank = 3.8, accumulated richness = 8.2) than control tanks (2.6 and 5.0, P\0.05). Treatment tanks developed assemblages with greater proportions of species adapted to pelagic conditions, such as planktonic cladocerans and copepods, while control tanks generally comprised of smaller, littoral dwelling, rotifers. Analysis of similarities indicated community composition differed between the control and treatment groups at 12 months (P\0.01). Two copepod, four rotifer and one cladoceran species were intentionally added to tanks at 12 months. In the 3 month post-introduction period, five of these species established populations in the control tanks, while only two species established in the treatment tanks. The calanoid copepod Skistodiaptomus pallidus, for example, a non-indigenous species confined to constructed waters in New Zealand, established exclusively in tanks where native calanoid copepod species were absent (primarily control tanks). Our study suggests that biotic resistance could play an important role in reducing the establishment rate of non-indigenous zooplankton. It also provides evidence that seeding constructed water bodies with sediments containing diapausing eggs of native species may provide an effective management tool to reduce establishment rates of non-indigenous zooplankton.en_NZ
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringeren_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://www.springerlink.com/content/x2303p7214583363/en_NZ
dc.subjectexotic speciesen_NZ
dc.subjectdamsen_NZ
dc.subjectreservoirsen_NZ
dc.subjectmanagerial toolen_NZ
dc.subjectzooplanktonen_NZ
dc.titleCan biotic resistance be utilized to reduce establishment rates of non-indigenous species in constructed waters?en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10530-011-0063-2en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfBiological Invasionsen_NZ
pubs.begin-page307en_NZ
pubs.declined2014-06-05T17:47:35.518+1200
pubs.deleted2014-06-05T17:47:35.518+1200
pubs.elements-id35854
pubs.end-page322en_NZ
pubs.issue2en_NZ
pubs.volume14en_NZ


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record