Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorWarneke, Sören
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, Louis A.
dc.contributor.authorMatiasek, Michael G.
dc.contributor.authorScow, Kate M.
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Stewart Graham
dc.contributor.authorBruesewitz, Denise A.
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Ian R.
dc.identifier.citationWarneke, S., Schipper, L.A., Matiasek, M.G., Scow, K.M., Cameron, S., Bruesewitz, D.A. & McDonald, I.R. (2011). Nitrate removal, communities of denitrifiers and adverse effects in different carbon substrates for use in denitrification beds. Water Research, 45(17), 5463-5475.en_NZ
dc.description.abstractDenitrification beds are containers filled with wood by-products that serve as a carbon and energy source to denitrifiers, which reduce nitrate (NO₃⁻) from point source discharges into non-reactive dinitrogen (N₂) gas. This study investigates a range of alternative carbon sources and determines rates, mechanisms and factors controlling NO₃⁻ removal, denitrifying bacterial community, and the adverse effects of these substrates. Experimental barrels (0.2 m³) filled with either maize cobs, wheat straw, green waste, sawdust, pine woodchips or eucalyptus woodchips were incubated at 16.8 °C or 27.1 °C (outlet temperature), and received NO₃⁻enriched water (14.38 mg N L⁻¹and 17.15 mg N L⁻¹). After 2.5 years of incubation measurements were made of NO₃⁻–N removal rates, in vitro denitrification rates (DR), factors limiting denitrification (carbon and nitrate availability, dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, and concentrations of NO₃⁻, nitrite and ammonia), copy number of nitrite reductase (nirS and nirK) and nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) genes, and greenhouse gas production (dissolved nitrous oxide (N₂O) and methane), and carbon (TOC) loss. Microbial denitrification was the main mechanism for NO₃⁻–N removal. Nitrate–N removal rates ranged from 1.3 (pine woodchips) to 6.2 g N m⁻³ d⁻¹ (maize cobs), and were predominantly limited by C availability and temperature (Q₁₀ = 1.2) when NO₃⁻–N outlet concentrations remained above 1 mg L⁻¹. The NO₃⁻–N removal rate did not depend directly on substrate type, but on the quantity of microbially available carbon, which differed between carbon sources. The abundance of denitrifying genes (nirS, nirK and nosZ) was similar in replicate barrels under cold incubation, but varied substantially under warm incubation, and between substrates. Warm incubation enhanced growth of nirS containing bacteria and bacteria that lacked the nosZ gene, potentially explaining the greater N2O emission in warmer environments. Maize cob substrate had the highest NO₃⁻–N removal rate, but adverse effects include TOC release, dissolved N₂O release and substantial carbon consumption by non-denitrifiers. Woodchips removed less than half of NO₃⁻ removed by maize cobs, but provided ideal conditions for denitrifying bacteria, and adverse effects were not observed. Therefore we recommend the combination of maize cobs and woodchips to enhance NO₃⁻ removal while minimizing adverse effects in denitrification beds.en_NZ
dc.subjectcontrolling factorsen_NZ
dc.subjectdenitrification genesen_NZ
dc.titleNitrate removal, communities of denitrifiers and adverse effects in different carbon substrates for use in denitrification bedsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfWater Researchen_NZ

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record