Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorUche, Chibueze Zimuzo
dc.contributor.authorRound, W. Howell
dc.contributor.authorCree, Michael J.
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-09T22:21:04Z
dc.date.available2011-11-09T22:21:04Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationUche, C.Z., Round, W.H. & Cree, M.J. (2011). Evaluation of two Compton camera models for scintimammography. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, available online 8 October 2011.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/5869
dc.description.abstractWe study the performance of a Si/LaBr3:Ce Compton camera model for scintimammography, and compare it with a Si/NaI(Tl) model of similar geometry. The GEANT4 simulation toolkit was used to study the behaviour of the cameras at 511 keV. Certain simulation steps, such as the modelling of radionuclide decay times, scintillation photon transport and interactions with photomultipliers, as well as detector dead time corrections were included to make the modelling of the cameras more realistic than previous studies. The Si/LaBr3:Ce Compton camera shows superior efficiency of 2.0×10⁻³ and resolution of 5.3 mm over the Si/NaI(Tl) Compton camera model which has the efficiency of 1.6×10⁻³ and resolution of 6.9 mm at a source-to-scatterer distance of interest, 2.5 cm. A similar result sequence is obtained for two breast tumours of 5 mm diameter embedded in the medial region of an average-size breast phantom of thickness 5 cm. Notably, the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) obtained for the Si/LaBr3:Ce camera are 9.7 and 3.4 for tumour/background radiation uptakes of 10:1 and 6:1, whereas 6.8 and 2.4 were obtained for the Si/NaI(Tl) camera model for the same tumour/background radiation uptakes respectively. It is therefore envisioned that with lower cost, LaBr3:Ce could replace NaI(Tl) as the Compton camera absorber.en_NZ
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevieren_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900211018547en_NZ
dc.subjectCompton cameraen_NZ
dc.subjectGEANT4en_NZ
dc.subjectScintimammographyen_NZ
dc.subjectscintillation detectoren_NZ
dc.subjectbreast tumouren_NZ
dc.titleEvaluation of two Compton camera models for scintimammographyen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nima.2011.09.058en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipmenten_NZ
pubs.begin-page1en_NZ
pubs.elements-id36594
pubs.end-page6en_NZ
pubs.issue1en_NZ
pubs.volumeonlineen_NZ


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record