Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Ranking economics departments in terms of residual productivity: New Zealand economics departments, 2000–2006

      Anderson, David L.; Tressler, John
      DOI
       10.1111/j.1467-8454.2011.00418.x
      Link
       onlinelibrary.wiley.com
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Anderson, D.L. & Tressler, J. (2011). Ranking economics departments in terms of residual productivity: New Zealand economics departments, 2000–2006. Australian Economics Papers, 50(4), 157-168.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/6231
      Abstract
      This paper utilises a human-capital approach for ranking the research productivity of academic departments. Our approach provides rankings in terms of residual research output after controlling for the key characteristics of each department's academic staff. More specifically, we estimate residual research output rankings for all of New Zealand's economics departments based on their publication performance over the 2000 to 2006 period. We do so after taking into account the following characteristics of each department's academic staff: gender, experience, seniority, academic credentials and academic rank. The paper demonstrates that the rankings generated by the residual research approach and those generated by traditional approaches to research rankings may be significantly different for some departments. These differences are important in determining the likely efficiency impact of research assessment exercises.
      Date
      2011
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Wiley-Blackwell
      Collections
      • Management Papers [1134]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement