Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Paul M.
dc.contributor.authorPhadnis, Joideep
dc.contributor.authorWilloughby, Richard
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Lynette Anne
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-21T22:04:30Z
dc.date.available2013-02-21T22:04:30Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationPhillips, P.M., Phadnis, J., Willoughby, R., Hunt, L.A. (2013). Posterior sloping angle as a predictor of contralateral slip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 95A(2), 146-150.en_NZ
dc.identifier.issn0021-9355
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/7233
dc.description.abstractBackground: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a condition with potentially severe complications. Controversy remains as to when to undertake prophylactic pinning. We aimed to assess the utility of the posterior sloping angle as a predictor for contralateral slip in a large, multi-ethnic cohort including Polynesian children with a high incidence of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Methods: All patients presenting to our hospital between 2000 and 2009 were identified and records were reviewed to determine demographic data and determine whether they subsequently developed a contralateral slip. The presenting radiographs were reviewed and the posterior sloping angle was measured. Patients with bilateral slips at presentation and those without initial radiographs were excluded. Results: Records and radiographs of 132 patients were analyzed for the posterior sloping angle in the unaffected hip. Forty-two patients who had subsequently developed a contralateral slip had a mean posterior sloping angle (and standard deviation) of 17.2 degrees +/- 5.6 degrees, which was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of 10.8 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees for the ninety patients who had had a unilateral slip. Children who had developed a subsequent contralateral slip were significantly younger (11.1 years) than those who had developed a unilateral slip (12.2 years) (p < 0.001). If a posterior sloping angle of 14 degrees were used as an indication for prophylactic fixation in this population, thirty-five (83.3%) of forty-two contralateral slips would have been prevented, and nineteen (21.1%) of ninety hips would have been pinned unnecessarily. The number needed to treat to prevent one subsequent contralateral slip is 1.79. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date that confirms that the posterior sloping angle is a reliable predictor of contralateral slip and can be used to guide prophylactic pinning. The posterior sloping angle is applicable in the high-risk Polynesian population and could be useful in preventing future slips in populations that are difficult to follow up.en_NZ
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://jbjs.org/article.aspx?articleid=1515038en_NZ
dc.subjectPolynesianen_NZ
dc.subjecthipen_NZ
dc.subjectPosterior sloping angleen_NZ
dc.subjectorthopedicsen_NZ
dc.titlePosterior sloping angle as a predictor of contralateral slip in slipped capital femoral epiphysisen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.2106/JBJS.L.00365en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Bone & Joint Surgeryen_NZ
pubs.begin-page146en_NZ
pubs.elements-id38254
pubs.end-page150en_NZ
pubs.issue2en_NZ
pubs.volume95en_NZ


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record