Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Are humans resources?

      Inkson, Kerr
      DOI
       10.1108/13620430810870511
      Link
       www.emeraldinsight.com
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Inkson, K. (2008). Are humans resources? Career Development International, 13(3), 270-279.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/8261
      Abstract
      Purpose – This paper aims to offer a critique, from a career studies perspective, of the common term “human resource management.”

      Design/methodology/approach – Provides a literature review and critique.

      Findings – The term “human resource management” is a metaphor that presents employees as passive commodities or assets rather than as active agents, and thereby potentially de-humanizes them. In an alternative view based on career studies, individual employees are active agents utilizing the resources of employing organizations to pursue personal goals. Alternative terms to “human resource management” are suggested.

      Research limitations/implications – There is scope for study of the effects of “human resources” terminology on employees' and others' view of and attitude to the human resource management function.

      Practical implications – Examination of “human resources” discourse may promote examination of the implications of current discourse for practice, facilitate moderation of practice, and stimulate the search for new discourse and new practice, by both organizations and individuals.

      Originality/value – This paper questions a prevailing and widely accepted form of discourse in management and advocates change.
      Date
      2008
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Emerald Group Publishing Limited
      Collections
      • Management Papers [1153]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement