Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Management
      • Management Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Does accounting construct the identity of firms as purely self-interested or as socially responsible?

      Lawrence, Stewart R.; Botes, Vida; Collins, Eva Marie; Roper, Juliet
      DOI
       10.1108/MEDAR-09-2012-0030
      Link
       www.emeraldinsight.com
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Lawrence, S. R., Botes, V., Collins, E., & Roper, J. (2013). Does accounting construct the identity of firms as purely self-interested or as socially responsible? Meditari Accountancy Research, 21(2), 144-160.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/8379
      Abstract
      Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to argue that it is time for change in the way the paper teach, theories and practice accounting. Traditional accounting practice constructs the identity of the accountable entity as purely self-interested. Yet, there is evidence that firms do engage in broader activities. This paper aims to explain and illustrate that there are groups of firms that engage in socially responsible activities, yet their accounting systems still assume autopoietic behavior. Accounting should resonate with social expectations, but at present it does not.

      Design/methodology/approach – Literature concerning theories of biological autopoiesis and social equivalents are reviewed. They are related to accounting practices, and to concepts of open and closed systems. The theories are related to survey results of socially responsible activities practiced by firms. National surveys undertaken in New Zealand at three-year intervals are the basis of the empirical content of the paper.

      Findings – There is evidence that firms behave socially and environmentally responsibly. Yet accounting practice does not encourage such behaviour. Accounting practice has to be able to construct the identity of the accountable entity so that it pursues more than its own self-interest, and resonate with societal expectations.

      Research limitations/implications – The paper is unconventional. It challenges extant practice. Its theoretical content may not appeal to many traditional accountants.

      Originality/value – The theory and empirics are original. The theory of autopoiesis is illustrated through survey evidence of business practices.
      Date
      2013
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Emerald Group Publishing Limited
      Collections
      • Management Papers [1135]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement