Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Neighbourly and unneighbourly behaviour in the Te Aroha district

      Hart, Philip
      Thumbnail
      Files
      No. 119 Neighbourly-unneighbourly.pdf
      1.084Mb
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Hart, P. (2016). Neighbourly and unneighbourly behaviour in the Te Aroha district. (Te Aroha Mining District Working papers, No. 119). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Historical Research Unit.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/10453
      Abstract
      As is to be expected, many examples could be found of neighbourly and unneighbourly behaviour. Because of the nature of their work, miners and indeed settlers generally had to help each other, and ‘fair play’ was a desired ideal. Residents mingled at weddings, funerals, farewells, and patriotic socials. When people were in need, assistance was given and money was raised by special events, and when fires broke out, everyone did their best to save both life and property.

      Despite such neighbourly acts, there were plenty of examples of quarrelsome residents and rude behaviour. In small settlements, prying and gossiping were endemic. Disliked residents were mocked, some practical jokes were malicious, and some libels were spread. In particular, local government politics provoked much bitterness over minor matters, and rivalry between Te Aroha and Waiorongomai could be friendly in sport but unfriendly on some issues. A detailed example of one prominent resident, Charles Ahier, is provided to illustrate how a pillar of the community was vilified and how he vilified his critics. Newspapers sometimes provided biased reporting, fanning the flames of petty disputes. But overall, squabbles were outweighed by positive interactions.
      Date
      2016
      Type
      Working Paper
      Series
      Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers
      Report No.
      119
      Publisher
      Historical Research Unit, University of Waikato
      Rights
      © 2016 Philip Hart
      Collections
      • Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers [160]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      108
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement