Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.advisorChalmers, Lex
dc.contributor.advisorEricksen, Neil
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Nathan Charles Karaua
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-26T00:14:18Z
dc.date.available2017-06-26T00:14:18Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationKennedy, N. C. K. (2017). Kaitiakitanga o te Taiao - Reconciling Legislative Provisions and Outcomes for Māori (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)). University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/11121en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/11121
dc.description.abstractThe Resource Management Act (1991) (RMA) was heralded as internationally ground-breaking for its integrated approach, and for cementing 'sustainable management' as its overarching purpose. It was ground-breaking also for its recognition of First Nations’ rights and values. This includes directing decision-makers to recognise and provide for the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral lands, waters and treasured resources, to have particular regard to Māori customary practices, and to take into account the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. The RMA provides for councils to transfer or delegate functions and powers to Māori, and for joint management arrangements. In 16 years as environment officer for my iwi, I witnessed the failure of the RMA to protect Māori values and interests. This experience prompted me to undertake research to thoroughly investigate outcomes of the operation of the RMA for Māori. Two questions framed my research; the first asking whether kaitiaki have been empowered by the Māori provisions in the RMA, and the second seeking to determine overall outcomes for Māori from the Act. Assessing such outcomes required an understanding of Māori values and interests, evaluation of the law, of the statutory plans that govern council administration of the RMA, implementation of these by councils and the Crown, and their treatment by the courts. To answer the two questions I present in this thesis a geographically focused study of two take (causes or significant issues) at Whangamatā, the construction of a marina, and the removal of mangroves. I compare Ngāti Whanaunga experiences with those of Māori nationally. By doing so I provide the evidence base for an 'overall broad judgement' (as the RMA requires) that despite apparent empowerment by the Act and its statutory plans, Māori have suffered widespread and significantly negative outcomes under the RMA. Rather than being empowered, Māori struggle to participate in planning processes, and see ancestral values and interests eroded by waves of resource consent processes, in which effects on Māori are little considered.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.isomi_NZ
dc.publisherUniversity of Waikato
dc.rightsAll items in Research Commons are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subjectKaitiakitanga
dc.subjectMāori environmentalism
dc.subjectManawa
dc.subjectMangroves
dc.subjectWhangamatā Marina
dc.subjectCustomary rights
dc.subjectTreaty of Waitangi
dc.subjectTreaty principles
dc.subjectthesis with publication
dc.titleKaitiakitanga o te Taiao - Reconciling Legislative Provisions and Outcomes for Māori
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Waikato
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
dc.date.updated2017-05-16T23:09:26Z
pubs.place-of-publicationHamilton, New Zealanden_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record