Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Theses
      • Higher Degree Theses
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Theses
      • Higher Degree Theses
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Judging What They Do: Formal, Informal, and Self Appraisal of New Zealand (Rural) Primary School Principals

      Earl Rinehart, (Suzanne) Kerry
      Thumbnail
      Files
      thesis.pdf
      2.005Mb
      Citation
      Export citation
      Earl Rinehart, (Suzanne) K. (2017). Judging What They Do: Formal, Informal, and Self Appraisal of New Zealand (Rural) Primary School Principals (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)). The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/11543
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/11543
      Abstract
      As in other western market economies, New Zealand government education policy reflects neoliberal economic thinking, neo-conservative ideals and practices of an audit culture. New Zealand’s self-managing schools’ policy, introduced in 1989, changed significantly the complexity of school principals’ work. Leadership frameworks and professional standards have ‘captured’ this complexity and support appraisal of principals.

      Neoliberal/neoconservative thinking has also influenced educational leadership research by focusing on individual leader characteristics and specific cases of ‘successful’ school principalship. Instead in this study formative assessment research provides the lens to (re)consider appraisal experience of six school principals in small rural primary schools. Using a contemporary-pragmatist approach, interviews, abductive processes of analysis and literary forms of representation were chosen as appropriate research design elements. The research concern was: to what extent does principal appraisal recognise the nature and complexity of expectations of principal work in specific school settings and consider the human being undertaking this work?

      Insights from this study come under the umbrella phrase it is people that matter. Thus, appraisal in this study reflects the nature of principals’ work—in the significance of interaction, management and professional judgement—more than aspects of administration or assessment. Recommendations include: future appraisal policy values principal-appraiser interaction; principal preparation and professional development programmes advocate for the importance of self-care and management in principalship; and research further explores the nature and influence of school communities on principals’ decision-making and the judgement of principals’ work.
      Date
      2017
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Name
      Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
      Supervisors
      Alcorn, Noeline
      Ussher, William (Bill) Grant
      Publisher
      The University of Waikato
      Rights
      All items in Research Commons are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
      Collections
      • Higher Degree Theses [1714]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      124
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement