Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorWeijers, Dan M.en_NZ
dc.contributor.authorUnger, Peter
dc.coverage.spatialUniversity of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealanden_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-07T03:41:22Z
dc.date.available2017en_NZ
dc.date.available2019-02-07T03:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2017en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationWeijers, D. M., & Unger, P. (2017). Deconstructive replication: How to tell if a thought experiment-population pairing is fit for purpose. Presented at the AXΦII: 2nd Annual Australasian Experimental Philosophy Conference, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/12314
dc.description.abstractThought experiments/scenarios are often rolled out to help answer research questions The idea is that they tell us what people really think, value, etc. about the research question But how do we know whether the judgments elicited are really about the research question? Scenarios might work well for some people but not others. What we need is a way to assess a scenario-population pairing’s fitness for purpose in relation to a particular research question
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourceAXΦII: 2nd Annual Australasian Experimental Philosophy Conferenceen_NZ
dc.titleDeconstructive replication: How to tell if a thought experiment-population pairing is fit for purposeen_NZ
dc.typeConference Contribution
pubs.elements-id212916
pubs.finish-date2017-07-30en_NZ
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato/2024 PBRF
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato/DASL
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato/DASL/2024 PBRF - DASL
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato/DASL/SSSI
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato/DASL/SSSI/PHIL
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://www.josephulatowski.net/axphil2017en_NZ
pubs.start-date2017-07-28en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record