Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Response to Martin Barker's 'Rise of the Qualiguants'

      Michelle, Carolyn; Davis, Charles H.; Hardy, Ann; Hight, Craig
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Response to Martin Barkers Rise of the Qualiguants.pdf
      Published version, 746.4Kb
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Michelle, C., Davis, C. H., Hardy, A., & Hight, C. (2018). Response to Martin Barker’s ‘Rise of the Qualiguants’. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 15(2), 376–399.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/12434
      Abstract
      In what follows, we respond to Martin Barker’s (2018a) review essay entitled ‘Rise of the Qualiquants,’ published in the previous issue of this journal (15:1). In his review, Barker offers an admittedly not disinterested assessment of our recent book Fans, Blockbusterisation, and the Transformation of Cinematic Desire: Global Receptions of The Hobbit Film Trilogy (Michelle, Davis, Hardy and Hight, 2017), and raises a number of questions relating to our ontological commitments and methodological approach, along with a critique of Q methodology more generally. We wish to express our sincere thanks to Martin for such a detailed and thoughtful review – evidently the first in what is to become a new section in Participations dedicated to much-needed debates on methodological, epistemological, and ontological issues in audience research. His essay generously draws attention to the contribution and significance of our project, and introduces our theoretical and methodological approach to a wider audience. The issues and questions he raises are certainly worthy of further clarification, discussion, and debate, and we are fortunate to have access to a highly suitable forum for this in Participations. We also fully share his commitment to the advancement of audience and reception research.
      Date
      2018
      Type
      Journal Article
      Rights
      © 2018 copyright with the authors.
      Collections
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers [1424]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      18
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement