Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Has the deceived businessman been deceiving philosophers?

      Weijers, Dan M.
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Has the deceived businessman been deceiving philosophers.pdf
      Accepted version, 215.5Kb
      Citation
      Export citation
      Weijers, D. M. (2017). Has the deceived businessman been deceiving philosophers? Presented at the New Zealand Association of Philosophers 2017 conference, University of Otago, New Zealand.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/12531
      Abstract
      In the deceived businessman thought experiment, we are asked to imagine the lives of two businessmen, equal in net pleasant experiences, but unequal in the amount of deception. Both lives are experienced as equally happy from the inside, but one is deceived about many important things, while the other isn’t. When comparing these two lives, people usually report that the non-deceived life is preferable to the deceived life. Philosophers working on wellbeing have used this result to discredit experiential accounts of wellbeing, especially prudential hedonism. I argue that two structural problems with the thought experiment preclude it from being a reliable source of evidence for drawing conclusions about wellbeing, including discrediting prudential hedonism. If I’m right that these structural problems mean the deceived businessman thought experiment should not be used when arguing about wellbeing, then several other influential thought experiments with the same structural problem might also be under threat.
      Date
      2017
      Type
      Conference Contribution
      Collections
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers [1405]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      68
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement