Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • National Institute of Demographic and Economic Analysis (NIDEA)
      • NIDEA Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • National Institute of Demographic and Economic Analysis (NIDEA)
      • NIDEA Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study

      Oetzel, John G.; Lao, Chunhuan; Morley, Michelle; Penman, Kathy; Child, Maree; Scott, Nina; Karalus, Miina
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study.pdf
      Published version, 705.8Kb
      DOI
       10.1186/s12889-019-6695-3
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Oetzel, J. G., Lao, C., Morley, M., Penman, K., Child, M., Scott, N., & Karalus, M. (2019). Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6695-3
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/12614
      Abstract
      Background

      Acute rheumatic fever in New Zealand persists and is a barometer of equity as its burden almost exclusively falls on Māori and Pacific Island populations. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether an incentive programme will result in increased secondary prophylaxis injections over a one-year period compared to a baseline period prior to the intervention.

      Methods

      The evaluation used a multiple baseline study to determine whether an incentive consisting of a mobile phone and monthly “top-up” (for data/calls) resulted in increased injections, increased texts/calls with nurses, reduced number of visits to get a successful injection, less medicine wasted, and increased nurse satisfaction. Participants were 77 young people (aged 14–21) on an acute rheumatic fever registry in Waikato region, New Zealand classified as either fully adherent (all injections received and no more than one late) or partially adherent based on injections at baseline.

      Results

      There was a sharp increase in injections for intermittent patients post-intervention and then a slight decrease overtime, while fully adherent patients maintained their high rate of injections (p = .003). A similar pattern for nurse satisfaction emerged (p = .001). The number of calls/texts increased for all patients (p = .003). The number of visits went down for partially adherent patients and up for fully adherent patients (p = .012). The overall incremental cost-effectiveness was $989 per extra successful injection although costs increased sharply toward the end of the intervention.

      Conclusions

      Incentivising secondary prophylaxis appears to have a strong impact for partially adherent patients, particularly during the early periods following the initiation of the intervention. Enhancing communication with patients who returned to care may result in more sustainable adherence.

      Trial registration

      Retrospectively registered: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001150235, 12 July 2018.
      Date
      2019
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      BMC
      Rights
      © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
      Collections
      • NIDEA Papers [99]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      54
       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement