Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Aphorisms and archipelagos: Relationality in modernist studies

      Long, Maebh
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Long - Aphorisms and Archipelagos - Relationality in Modernist Studies - Repository (1).pdf
      Accepted version, 452.4Kb
      DOI
       10.1163/9789004400061_012
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Long, M. (2019). Aphorisms and archipelagos: Relationality in modernist studies. In K. Boyiopoulos & M. Shallcross (Eds.), Aphoristic Modernity: 1880 to the Present (Vol. 6, pp. 190–205). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400061_012
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/13650
      Abstract
      Modernist studies, these days, is on the move. Global, planetary, transnational, postcolonial, and geomodernist rubrics map new routes of aesthetic interconnection and change as the geographical and temporal reaches of modernism are extended. Monographs and collections speak of mobility, dynamism, and hybridity across the local and the global, as texts trace out identities and contexts that are, as Jahan Ramazani puts it, ‘discretely located and thoroughly enmeshed, networked, cross-racialized’ (16). Eric Hayot and Rebecca Walkowitz, to take one example, write of ‘shifting concept[s] of fixity and centrality’ (3) in their New Vocabulary for Global Modernism (2016), and embrace modernism as a series of changing frames that react to local conditions, international systems, and a plurality of other spatial and temporal scales (8). Their book presents the moving parts of modernism through different lenses, allowing its global reach to present new terms and revitalise old ones, as changing local and international relations present different views.
      Date
      2019
      Type
      Chapter in Book
      Publisher
      Brill
      Rights
      © Copyright 2020 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Brill in Aphoristic Modernity
      Collections
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers [1405]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      116
       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement