Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.advisorMorgan, Gay
dc.contributor.advisorHemi, Keakaokawai Varner
dc.contributor.advisorBrennan, Anna Marie
dc.contributor.authorTabuni, Kerinus Kerry
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-20T02:24:39Z
dc.date.available2023-09-20T02:24:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/16038
dc.description.abstractWest Papua was incorporated into Indonesia under the 1962 New York Agreement, which was signed between the Netherlands and Indonesia without involving indigenous West Papuans. The Agreement attempted to legitimise Indonesia’s claim of sovereignty over West Papua. It is the narrative around this Agreement that effectively dictates indigenous West Papuans' lives, including their subjugation to historical and ongoing human rights violations. This thesis closely examines the legal grounds of Indonesia’s claim, with a particular focus on whether the New York Agreement was legitimately and authentically implemented through the processes of the 1969 Act of Free Choice. Using primary and secondary sources, this thesis examines the legality of Indonesia’s occupation in West Papua. It begins with the circumvention of international laws that prevented indigenous West Papuans from gaining the benefit of international decolonisation regimes during international decolonisation periods, which ultimately led to the re-colonisation of West Papua. A careful historical examination confirms that the indigenous people of West Papua have lost their legitimate standing in international law. The thesis contends the intentions behind the creation of the New York Agreement were not genuine, but that the Agreement was a purposely imposed colonising law to recolonise the territory. By employing key legal arguments, this thesis contends that Indonesia's sovereignty claim over West Papua is legally invalid, historically unjustified and morally unacceptable. On reviewing both historical and ongoing violations of the human rights in the region, this thesis further argues that an internationally mandated process of self-determination should be considered as a legal remedy. The claims of indigenous West Papuans are historically supported, legally grounded and empirically demonstrated. This thesis establishes legal frameworks within the international law and institutions that can be utilised as practical pathways to West Papuan self-determination, with a particular focus on options within the United Nations systems.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe University of Waikato
dc.rightsAll items in Research Commons are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subjectIndigenous People of West Papua
dc.subjectThe 1962 New York Agreement
dc.subjectDecolonisation of West Papua
dc.subjectInternational Human Rights Law and West Papua
dc.subjectHuman Rights Issues in the Pacific
dc.subjectDecolonisation of the Pacific: The Case of West Papua
dc.subject.lcshPapua (Indonesia) -- Politics and government
dc.subject.lcshIndonesia -- Politics and government -- 1950-1966
dc.subject.lcshUnited Nations -- Indonesia -- Papua
dc.subject.lcshSelf-determination, National -- Indonesia -- Papua
dc.subject.lcshInternational law -- Indonesia -- Papua
dc.subject.lcshHuman rights -- Indonesia -- Papua
dc.subject.lcshSovereignty
dc.subject.lcshPapua (Indonesia) -- Colonization
dc.titleImpact of the 1962 New York Agreement on Indigenous West Papuans’ Political, Cultural and Territorial Rights: A historical and legal analysis of West Papuans’ rights to self-determination
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Waikato
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Philosophy (MPhil)
dc.date.updated2023-08-28T16:25:36Z
pubs.place-of-publicationHamilton, New Zealanden_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record