Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Arts and Social Sciences
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Accidental rightness

      van Zyl, Liezl
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Accidental Rightness PHILOSOPHIA.pdf
      171.1Kb
      DOI
       10.1007/s11406-008-9136-6
      Link
       www.springerlink.com
      Find in your library  
      Citation
      Export citation
      Van Zyl, L. (2009). Accidental rightness. Philosophia, 39, 91-104.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/2087
      Abstract
      In this paper I argue that the disagreement between modern moral philosophers and (some) virtue ethicists about whether motive affects rightness is a result of conceptual disagreement, and that when they develop a theory of ‘right action,’ the two parties respond to two very different questions. Whereas virtue ethicists tend to use ‘right’ as interchangeable with ‘good’ or ‘virtuous’ and as implying moral praise, modern moral philosophers use it as roughly equivalent to ‘in accordance with moral obligation.’ One implication of this is that the possibility of an act being right by accident does not pose a problem for consequentialism or deontology. A further implication is that it reveals a shortcoming in virtue ethics, namely that it does not—yet needs to—present an account of moral obligation.
      Date
      2009
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Springer Netherlands
      Rights
      This is an author's accepted version of an article published in the journal: Philosophia. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com.
      Collections
      • Arts and Social Sciences Papers [1424]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      110
       
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement