Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorGoldsmith, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-19T04:57:04Z
dc.date.available2007-04-01en_US
dc.date.available2008-03-19T04:57:04Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationGoldsmith, M. (2003). Culture, for and against: patterns of "Culturespeak" in New Zealand. Journal of the Polynesian Society. 112(3), 280-294.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/437
dc.description.abstractCulture is invoked not only as a means of justifying redress for discrimination or historical injustice, but also as a standard of accountability by which the upholding of rights (or their suppression) can be measured. Rather than assume conceptual coherence regarding the notion of culture that such applications appear to share, it is proposed to analyse them as terms within a broad and open-ended field of 'culturespeak', a concept generally ascribed to Ulf Hannerz.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe Polynesian Society (Inc)en_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://www.arts.auckland.ac.nz/departments/index.cfm?P=9144en_US
dc.rightsThe Journal of the Polynesian Society (JPS) is published by The Polynesian Society. (c) 2003 Polynesian Society (Inc.).en_US
dc.subjectmulticulturalismen_US
dc.subjectbiculturalismen_US
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_US
dc.subjectcultural policyen_US
dc.subjectsocial life and customsen_US
dc.titleCulture, for and against: patterns of "Culturespeak" in New Zealanden_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfThe Journal of the Polynesian Society: Special Issue: Postcolonial Dilemmas: Reappraising Justice and Identity in New Zealand and Australiaen_NZ
pubs.begin-page280en_NZ
pubs.editionSeptemberen_NZ
pubs.elements-id29613
pubs.end-page294en_NZ
pubs.issue3en_NZ
pubs.volume112en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record