Critical discussion of Daniel C. Dennett, The Intentional Stance.
Lumsden, D. (1993). Critical discussion of Daniel C. Dennett, The Intentional Stance. Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 39(1), 101-109.
Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/447
Daniel Dennett spends a good bit of time defending the possibility of a compromise position on the reality of beliefs and desires. It will be claimed that a puzzle remains in the interpretation of Dennett's position. In earlier works one finds a theme, which we can call 'near-fatalism', which has not been integrated with the kind of middle ground he describes. But the near-fatalism theme is dropped in later work. Is it because it is felt to be incompatible with that middle ground compromise? It is not obviously so.
This article is the authors postprint version of an article published in the journal, Erkenntnis, Vol 39. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com.