Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorvan Zyl, Liezl
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-14T03:01:44Z
dc.date.available2011-11-14T03:01:44Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationVan Zyl, L. (2011). Qualified-agent virtue ethics. South African Journal of Philosophy, 30(2), 219-228.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/5882
dc.description.abstractQualified-agent virtue ethics provides an account of right action in terms of the virtuous agent. It has become one of the most popular, but also most frequently criticized versions of virtue ethics. Many of the objections rest on the mistaken assumption that proponents of qualified-agent virtue ethics share the same view when it comes to fundamental questions about the meaning of the term ‘right action’ and the function of an account of right action. My aim in this paper is not to defend qualified-agent virtue ethics but to correct this misunderstanding, and this will hopefully leave us in a better position to evaluate it.en_NZ
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPhilosophical Society of Southern Africa (PSSA)en_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://ajol.info/index.php/sajpem/article/view/67784en_NZ
dc.subjectvirtuous agenten_NZ
dc.subjectqualified-agent virtue ethicsen_NZ
dc.titleQualified-agent virtue ethicsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.4314/sajpem.v30i2.67784en_NZ
dc.relation.isPartOfThe South African Journal of Philosophyen_NZ
pubs.begin-page219en_NZ
pubs.elements-id36242
pubs.end-page228en_NZ
pubs.issue2en_NZ
pubs.volume30en_NZ


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record