Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Law
      • Law Papers
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Research
      • Law
      • Law Papers
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      New Zealand designs law: The case for reform

      Kingsbury, Anna
      Thumbnail
      Files
      Kingsbury New Zealand Designs Law.pdf
      3.535Mb
      Link
       www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk
      Citation
      Export citation
      Kingsbury, A. (2009). New Zealand designs law: The case for reform. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 3, 345-372.
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/7816
      Abstract
      This article is about New Zealand designs law, considered in an international and comparative context. It argues that New Zealand designs law is unsustainable and in need of reform. New Zealand is a small jurisdiction with a relatively small manufacturing industry, and New Zealand is a net importer of technology. Yet New Zealand operates a designs regime which is more protective of design than jurisdictions with proportionately much larger manufacturing and design based industries. Designs regimes in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom and Europe are all less protective and more conducive to competition and innovation than the existing New Zealand regime. New Zealand operates a designs law regime which is over-protective, which excessively interferes with healthy competition to the disadvantage of consumers, and which imposes excessive burdens on second-comers and follow-on innovation. New Zealand's designs regime also significantly disadvantages New Zealand designers as compared with non-resident designers, and creates obstacles to exporters. The article reviews the international law framework for designs protection, and the regimes in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom and Europe. It argues that reform of the New Zealand designs regime is now overdue, and reviews the reform proposals and processes that have been undertaken over the last two decades.
      Date
      2009
      Type
      Journal Article
      Publisher
      Thomson Reuters
      Rights
      This article has been published in the journal: Intellectual Property Quarterly. © 2009 Thomson Reuters Ltd and the author. Used with permission.
      Collections
      • Law Papers [303]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      44
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement