Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorWalmsley, Timothy Gordon
dc.contributor.authorWalmsley, Michael R.W.
dc.contributor.authorAtkins, Martin John
dc.contributor.authorNeale, James R.
dc.coverage.spatialPrague,Czech Republic
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-11T22:50:10Z
dc.date.available2012-08-27
dc.date.available2015-01-11T22:50:10Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-27
dc.identifier.citationWalmsley, T. G., Walmsley, M. R. W., Atkins, M. J., Hoffman-Vocke, J., & Neale, J. R. (2012). Numerical performance comparison of different tube cross–sections for heat recovery from particle-laden exhaust gas streams. Procedia Engineering, 42, 1351-1364.
dc.identifier.isbn9781627486125
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/9042
dc.description.abstractHeat recovery from exhaust gas streams is applicable to a wide variety of industries. However, high heat transfer resistance of gases and the presence of entrained particulate matter that readily fouls limits industry uptake of current heat recovery technology. Improvements to standard heat exchanger designs are needed. In this study Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is used to investigate the effect of ten different tube cross-sections on heat transfer resistance, gas flow resistance and foulability. The average wall shear stress around the shape is used to predict foulability and an estimated asymptotic fouling resistance is used to calculate an equivalent fouled Coulburn j factor, jf. CFD results show the best tube for exhaust heat recovery is an elliptical tube closely followed by the flattened round tube. The ellipse shape produced fouled Coulburn j factor, jf values, expressed as a ratio of tube bank friction factor f, over 100% higher than that of standard round tube. A flattened round tube is also promising, given enough spacing between the tubes, and may be the practical economic optimum.
dc.format.extent1351-1364
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Procedia
dc.source20th International Congress of Chemical and Process Engineering
dc.titleNumerical performance comparison of different tube cross-sections for heat recovery from particle-laden exhaust gas streams
dc.typeConference Contribution
dc.relation.isPartOfChemical and Process Engineering, International Congress. 20th 2012 (CHISA 2012) (3 PARTS)
pubs.begin-page1351en_NZ
pubs.elements-id84953
pubs.end-page1364en_NZ
pubs.finish-date2012-08-29
pubs.place-of-publicationUSA
pubs.start-date2012-08-25
pubs.volumeProcedia Engineering Volume 42


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record