Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorChevalier-Watts, Julieten_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-28T19:58:12Z
dc.date.available2015en_NZ
dc.date.available2015-10-28T19:58:12Z
dc.date.issued2015en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationChevalier-Watts, J. (2015). Equity: Kennedy v Boyle. New Zealand Law Journal, July, 226–227.en
dc.identifier.issn0028-8373en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/9691
dc.description.abstractThe actions that led to this particular case hit the national headlines, and its resulting judgment has been subject to much scrutiny (see for example M B Rodriguez Ferrez “School Disciplinary Decisions, Judicial Review and Interim Relief” NZLJ June 2015 178-181), so commentary on this case in relation to the issue of interim injunctions is undoubtedly of interest. The background to this case is that 10 students of St Bede’s College, Christchurch, were selected to compete in the Maadi Cup, a national rowing regatta, at Lake Karapiro in the Waikato. At Auckland airport, two students, Jack Bell and Jordan Kennedy, rode, without authorisation, on the baggage carousel in to the secure baggage area. The boys were spoken to by the police and security offices, with no further action being taken. The Rector of the College, Justin Boyle, decided to suspend the two boys, and required them to return to Christchurch. This prevented the boys from being considered for selection in trials for the national rowing team.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLexisNexis NZ Ltden_NZ
dc.rightsThis is the submitted version of an article published in the journal: New Zealand Law Journal. ©2015 LexisNexis NZ Ltd. Used with permission.
dc.titleEquity: Kennedy v Boyleen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.relation.isPartOfNew Zealand Law Journalen_NZ
pubs.begin-page226
pubs.elements-id129039
pubs.end-page227
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato
pubs.organisational-group/Waikato/FLAW
pubs.volumeJulyen_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record