Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorChevalier-Watts, Julieten_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-28T20:07:40Z
dc.date.available2014en_NZ
dc.date.available2015-10-28T20:07:40Z
dc.date.issued2014en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationChevalier-Watts, J. (2014). Equity: Tarasiewicz v Titford. The New Zealand Law Journal, April, 86–86.en
dc.identifier.issn0028-8373en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/9694
dc.description.abstractThe trustees sought an order under s 64(1) of the Trustee Act 1956 giving them the power to sell the property in question. Lang J confirmed that the Trust Deed would permit such a sale but the Court had to be satisfied that the sale would expedient for the trust as a whole, and not merely in the interests of one beneficiary. A key factor underpinning the Trust’s original decision to acquire property had been removed and significant capital expenditure was required to improve the property. The only realistic way of resolving the problems was to sell the property, thus it would be expedient in the management and administration of Trust to sell the property as well as being in the interests of all the beneficiaries.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLexisNexis NZ Limiteden_NZ
dc.rightsThis is the submitted version of an article published in the journal: New Zealand Law Journal. ©2014 LexisNexis NZ Ltd. Used with permission.
dc.titleEquity: Tarasiewicz v Titforden_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.relation.isPartOfThe New Zealand Law Journalen_NZ
pubs.begin-page86
pubs.elements-id84669
pubs.end-page86
pubs.volumeAprilen_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record