Show simple item record  

dc.contributor.authorChevalier-Watts, Julieten_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-28T20:19:24Z
dc.date.available2015en_NZ
dc.date.available2015-10-28T20:19:24Z
dc.date.issued2015en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationChevalier-Watts, J. (2015). Case commentary: Bethell v Bethell [2014] NZSC177. The New Zealand Law Journal, Febuary, 31–32.en
dc.identifier.issn0028-8373en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/9698
dc.description.abstractOn the 3rd December 2014, the Supreme Court closed the chapter on an ongoing family dispute concerned with a piece of land in Auckland; the dispute was between the ex wife and the widow against their sister in law. The Supreme Court dismissed the ex-wife and widow’s application for leave to appeal, meaning that the ruling of the Court of Appeal remained in favour of Chrissie, the daughter of the will-maker, John Bethall. The Supreme Court determined that the matter had been thoroughly examined by the High Court and the Court of Appeal, and that neither Court had erred in their interpretation of the deed in the context of the particular circumstances of the case.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLexisNexis NZ Limiteden_NZ
dc.rightsThis is the submitted version of an article published in the journal: New Zealand Law Journal. ©2014 LexisNexis NZ Ltd. Used with permission.
dc.titleCase commentary: Bethell v Bethell [2014] NZSC177en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.relation.isPartOfThe New Zealand Law Journalen_NZ
pubs.begin-page31
pubs.elements-id119424
pubs.end-page32
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_NZ
pubs.volumeFebuaryen_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record