Timing of reinforcement during dog training

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBrowne, Clare Melody
dc.contributor.authorStarkey, Nicola J.
dc.contributor.authorFoster, T. Mary
dc.contributor.authorMcEwan, James S.A.
dc.coverage.spatialConference held at Vienna, Austriaen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-24T02:10:41Z
dc.date.available2011-02-24T02:10:41Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractResearch on dog-human communication has demonstrated that dogs are extremely responsive to human cues such as pointing, eye gazing and vocalizations. Because dogs are so receptive to such cues, it is reasonable to assume that subtle feedback from humans has an effect on the efficacy of dog training. Timing of reinforcement in the field of dog behavior has not been researched extensively. Research on other species has demonstrated that although animals can learn tasks with delays to reinforcement, longer delays result in longer average times to task acquisition and relatively lower rates of responding. The aim of this study was to examine owners’ latencies to providing reinforcers for their dogs’ responses during basic dog training. Video observations were made at three New Zealand dog obedience clubs. Fifteen people volunteered to take part in this study with their dogs. All participants were members of beginner classes and were videoed while training their dogs in class. Behaviors appropriate for examining the timing of reinforcement required a clearly-definable start and finish point, so ‘sit’ and ‘down’ were chosen for analysis. Times were measured between the owners’ commands, the dogs’ responses, secondary reinforcement (verbal praise), and primary reinforcement (food). Preliminary analysis of data from seven participants shows that dogs were reinforced for responding correctly to 27% of commands. These events were used for timing analysis. In addition, the dogs responded correctly but received no reinforcer of any type for 31% of commands, they responded incorrectly to 2% of commands and 40% of commands elicited no response from the dogs. There was considerable variation across participants’ timing of reinforcement with the latency to deliver the first instance of reinforcement (secondary or primary) ranging from 0 to > 5 seconds. No significant difference was found between owners’ latency to deliver secondary or primary reinforcement (t (5) = −1.66, P = 0.16) or between the times taken to reinforce ‘sit’ or ‘down’ responses (t (5) = −0.65, P = 0.54) (first instance of reinforcement). Results showed a positive correlation between the time to the first instance of reinforcement and the proportion of incorrect responses (r (7) = 0.65, P = 0.12). We conclude that given the wide range of latencies to reinforcement, it is possible that the dogs’ task acquisition was suboptimal at times. Delays to reinforcement may also give room for unintentional feedback to occur, particularly as dogs are so receptive to human-given cues. Ongoing research will attempt to address these questions.en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationBrowne, C.M., Starkey, N.J., Foster, M.T. & McEwan, J.S. (2011). Timing of reinforcement during dog training. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 6(1), 58-59.en_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jveb.2010.09.058en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10289/5097
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Veterinary Behavioren_NZ
dc.source2nd Canine Science Forum: Clinical Applications and Researchen_NZ
dc.subjecttrainingen_NZ
dc.subjecttimingen_NZ
dc.subjectreinforcementen_NZ
dc.subjectcommunicationen_NZ
dc.subjectlearningen_NZ
dc.titleTiming of reinforcement during dog trainingen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
pubs.begin-page58en_NZ
pubs.elements-id20375
pubs.end-page59en_NZ
pubs.finish-date2010-07-28en_NZ
pubs.issue1en_NZ
pubs.start-date2010-07-25en_NZ
pubs.volume6en_NZ
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Name: license.txt
Size: 1.71 KB
Kind: License
Collections
Arts and Social Sciences Papers