Research Commons
      • Browse 
        • Communities & Collections
        • Titles
        • Authors
        • By Issue Date
        • Subjects
        • Types
        • Series
      • Help 
        • About
        • Collection Policy
        • OA Mandate Guidelines
        • Guidelines FAQ
        • Contact Us
      • My Account 
        • Sign In
        • Register
      View Item 
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Theses
      • Masters Degree Theses
      • View Item
      •   Research Commons
      • University of Waikato Theses
      • Masters Degree Theses
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Motivation, constraint and association: an analysis of Killeen's (1994) mathematical principles of reinforcement.

      Armstrong, Rebecca Theresa
      Thumbnail
      Files
      thesis.pdf
      971.7Kb
      Data.xlsx
      368.8Kb
      Citation
      Export citation
      Armstrong, R. T. (2015). Motivation, constraint and association: an analysis of Killeen’s (1994) mathematical principles of reinforcement. (Thesis, Master of Applied Psychology (MAppPsy)). University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/9742
      Permanent Research Commons link: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/9742
      Abstract
      Mathematical principles of reinforcement (MPR; Killeen, 1994) is a useful model for predicting and describing behaviour. MPR is based upon three general principles represented by three independent parameters in the model: (1) incentives elicit responses and the quality or amount of a reinforcer will effect organisms arousal and motivation to work for that particular reinforcer (specific activation; a in the model), (2) there are time and energy constraints on responding resulting in ceilings on response rates (constraint; δ), and (3) reinforcement only occurs to the extent that responses are associated with reinforcers (Coupling; c.). This experiment tested the ability of MPR to predict response rates when the minimum force requirement to make a response and the reinforcer duration was increased. Five hens responded on a geometric fixed ratio (FR) schedule in three conditions; low force requirement, small reinforcer (0.24 N, 2-s access), high force requirement, small reinforcer (1.1 N, 2-s access) and high force requirement, large reinforcer (1.1 N, 4-s access). Response rates were well described by a bitonic function as predicted. Response rates were higher and the hens ceased responding at higher FR values when the force requirement was low. Constraint (δ) was not significantly affected by the increase in force requirement. Interestingly, estimates of a were most effected by the increase in force requirement. Estimates of a were not affected by the increase in the magnitude of the reinforcer. It was concluded that doubling the incentive value may require more than doubling the amount of reinforcement. Additionally, there may be a need to distinguish between time to make a response and effort required with the latter impacting more on the motivation of the organism.
      Date
      2015
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Name
      Master of Applied Psychology (MAppPsy)
      Supervisors
      Bizo, Lewis A.
      McEwan, James S.A.
      Publisher
      University of Waikato
      Rights
      All items in Research Commons are provided for private study and research purposes and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
      Collections
      • Masters Degree Theses [2385]
      Show full item record  

      Usage

      Downloads, last 12 months
      32
       
       

      Usage Statistics

      For this itemFor all of Research Commons

      The University of Waikato - Te Whare Wānanga o WaikatoFeedback and RequestsCopyright and Legal Statement